Re: BUG #14294: Problem in generate series between dates
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #14294: Problem in generate series between dates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31168.1472069440@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #14294: Problem in generate series between dates (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #14294: Problem in generate series between dates
Re: BUG #14294: Problem in generate series between dates |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: > This _looks_ wrong: > set timezone = 'America/Santiago'; > select timestamptz '2016-08-13', timestamptz '2016-08-13' + interval '1 day'; > timestamptz | ?column? > ------------------------+------------------------ > 2016-08-13 00:00:00-04 | 2016-08-14 01:00:00-03 > (1 row) > but I guess it's inevitable, since 2016-08-14 00:00:00 doesn't exist in > the local time, so there's no other possible result to return. Yeah. And after that, the shift persists, eg. # select '2016-08-14 01:00:00-03'::timestamptz + '1 day'::interval; ?column? ------------------------ 2016-08-15 01:00:00-03 (1 row) That's a bit annoying, because it works if you skip over that day: # select '2016-08-13'::timestamptz + '2 days'::interval; ?column? ------------------------ 2016-08-15 00:00:00-03 (1 row) In other words, we could make this scenario "work" if we defined generate_series as base plus N times the increment, rather than as repeated addition of the increment. But I wouldn't be surprised if that would break other corner cases (and it would certainly be slower). Daylight-savings time is not one of the more consistent things in our world ... not that anything at all about the civil calendar is mathematically nice :-(. Certainly, the right answer in this example case is to use the timestamp not timestamptz flavor of generate_series. Or you could use the integer flavor and add the results to a base date using the date + integer operator. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: