Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3115.1332175511@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> 1. ExecuteQuery still has to know that's a CREATE TABLE AS operation so >> that it can enforce that the prepared query is a SELECT. (BTW, maybe >> this should be weakened to "something that returns tuples", in view of >> RETURNING?) > +1 for "something that returns with tuples". CREATE TABLE ... AS > DELETE FROM ... WHERE ... RETURNING ... seems like a cool thing to > support. For the moment I've backed off that idea. The main definitional question we'd have to resolve is whether we want to allow WITH NO DATA, and if so what does that mean (should the DELETE execute, or not?). I am also not certain that the RETURNING code paths would cope with a WITH OIDS specification, and there are some other things that would need fixed. It might be cool to do it sometime, but it's not going to happen in this patch. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: