Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31093.1511128189@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I think this: > #define IsClientBackend() \ > (MyBackendId != InvalidBackendId && \ > !IsAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() && \ > !IsAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() && \ > !am_walsender && \ > !IsBackgroundWorker) > probably belongs somewhere more central. Surely this isn't the only > place that we want to be able to run such a test? Hm. It also seems awfully awkward. Perhaps it's not being used anyplace performance-critical, but regardless of speed it seems like a modularity violation, in that client backends have to be explicitly aware of everything that isn't a "client backend". Maybe it's time to invent something corresponding to AuxProcType for non "aux" processes, or else to fold all types of Postgres processes into the same enum. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: