Re: pg_partition_tree crashes for a non-defined relation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_partition_tree crashes for a non-defined relation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31090.1551458300@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_partition_tree crashes for a non-defined relation (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_partition_tree crashes for a non-defined relation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:50:16PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> But, having said that, we've learned that it's generally bad for >> catalog-query functions to fail outright just because they're pointed >> at the wrong kind of catalog object. So I think that what we want here >> is for pg_partition_tree to return NULL or an empty set or some such >> for a plain table, while its output for a childless partitioned table >> should be visibly different from that. I'm not wedded to details >> beyond that idea. > Yep, that's the intention since cc53123. I won't come back to return > an ERROR in any case. Here is what the patch gives for childless > partitions FWIW: > =# CREATE TABLE ptif_test (a int, b int) PARTITION BY range (a); > CREATE TABLE > =# SELECT * FROM pg_partition_tree('ptif_test'); > relid | parentrelid | isleaf | level > -----------+-------------+--------+------- > ptif_test | null | f | 0 > (1 row) Right, while you'd get zero rows out for a non-partitioned table. WFM. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: