Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3103.1313420035@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:20, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> However, for a narrow fix, I could see moving the data type definition >> to someplace with fewer dependencies. �Perhaps split it into a separate >> file timestamp_type.h, or something like that. > Yes, that seems to fix the problem of timestamptz. See the attached > patch - seems ok? Don't think you should expose fsec_t, nor most of those macros. The foo_per_bar values are just namespace clutter. > I also ran into a similar problem with some WAL macro definitions that > are in xlog_internal.h. I've moved them to xlogdefs.h in the attached > xlog.diff file. Does that seem ok as well, or should I move them > somewhere else? I don't like the idea of exposing those to frontends, either. What do you actually *need* out of that, and why? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: