Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3102.1551497150@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 3/1/19 6:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> No patch referenced, but I assume you mean only for the >> zero-bytes-received case, right? No objection if so. > Patch proposed by Christoph Berg is here: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190228151336.GB7550%40msg.df7cb.de Meh. That doesn't silence only the zero-bytes case, and I'm also rather afraid of the fact that it's changing COMMERROR to something else. I wonder whether (if client_min_messages <= DEBUG1) it could result in trying to send the error message to the already-lost connection. It might be that that can't happen, but I think a fair amount of rather subtle (and breakable) analysis may be needed. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: