Re: [HACKERS] retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31019.1499697969@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is*still* broken) (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
[HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is*still* broken)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Jul 10, 2017 16:08, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Okay, so that leaves us with a decision to make: push it into beta2, or >> wait till after wrap? I find it pretty scary to push a patch with >> portability implications so soon before wrap, but a quick look at the >> buildfarm suggests we'd get runs from 3 or 4 Windows members before the >> wrap, if I do it quickly. If we wait, then it will hit the field in >> production releases with reasonable buildfarm testing but little more. >> That's also pretty scary. >> On balance I'm tempted to push it now for beta2, but it's a close call. >> Thoughts? > Given the lack of windows testing on non packaged releases I think we > should definitely push this for beta2. That will give it a much better real > world testing on what is still a beta. > If it breaks its a lot better to do it in beta2 (and possibly quickly roll > a beta3) than in production. Shall we go for broke and also remove the ASLR-disabling patch in beta2? I do not feel a need to back-patch that one, at least not yet. But if we're going to do it any time soon, a beta seems like the time. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: