Fwd: Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster
От | Yves Vindevogel |
---|---|
Тема | Fwd: Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 30dcefefa83f93cb069019fd41427a03@implements.be обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Ok, I will hate that day, but it's only 6 months Begin forwarded message: <excerpt><bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>From: </color></bold>Vivek Khera <<vivek@khera.org> <bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>Date: </color></bold>Fri 17 Jun 2005 23:26:43 CEST <bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>To: </color></bold>Yves Vindevogel <<yves.vindevogel@implements.be> <bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>Subject: </color>Re: [PERFORM] Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster </bold> On Jun 17, 2005, at 5:24 PM, Yves Vindevogel wrote: <excerpt><fontfamily><param>Georgia</param><bigger>That means that only 2 / 5 of my discs are actual storage. That's a bit low, imho.</bigger></fontfamily> <fontfamily><param>Georgia</param><bigger>Maybe I can ask my question again:</bigger></fontfamily> <fontfamily><param>Georgia</param><bigger>Would I go for RAID 5, RAID 0 or PG clustering</bigger></fontfamily> <fontfamily><param>Georgia</param><bigger>On 17 Jun 2005, at 22:21, Vivek Khera wrote:</bigger></fontfamily> </excerpt><color><param>0000,0000,DDDD</param>If you're allergic to RAID10, then do RAID5. but you'll sacrifice performance. You'll hate life the day you blow a disk and have to rebuild everything, even if it is all easily restored.</color> </excerpt>Met vriendelijke groeten, Bien à vous, Kind regards, <bold>Yves Vindevogel</bold> <bold>Implements</bold> <smaller> </smaller>Ok, I will hate that day, but it's only 6 months Begin forwarded message: > From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> > Date: Fri 17 Jun 2005 23:26:43 CEST > To: Yves Vindevogel <yves.vindevogel@implements.be> > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster > > > On Jun 17, 2005, at 5:24 PM, Yves Vindevogel wrote: > >> That means that only 2 / 5 of my discs are actual storage. That's a >> bit low, imho. >> >> Maybe I can ask my question again: >> Would I go for RAID 5, RAID 0 or PG clustering >> >> On 17 Jun 2005, at 22:21, Vivek Khera wrote: > If you're allergic to RAID10, then do RAID5. but you'll sacrifice > performance. You'll hate life the day you blow a disk and have to > rebuild everything, even if it is all easily restored. > > > > Met vriendelijke groeten, Bien à vous, Kind regards, Yves Vindevogel Implements <smaller> Mail: yves.vindevogel@implements.be - Mobile: +32 (478) 80 82 91 Kempische Steenweg 206 - 3500 Hasselt - Tel-Fax: +32 (11) 43 55 76 Web: http://www.implements.be <italic><x-tad-smaller> First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. Mahatma Ghandi.</x-tad-smaller></italic></smaller> Mail: yves.vindevogel@implements.be - Mobile: +32 (478) 80 82 91 Kempische Steenweg 206 - 3500 Hasselt - Tel-Fax: +32 (11) 43 55 76 Web: http://www.implements.be First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. Mahatma Ghandi.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: