Re: Cities name column name inconsistent
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cities name column name inconsistent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 30cc267d-8799-1ea7-a628-7e4fa6967f26@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cities name column name inconsistent (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cities name column name inconsistent
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On 14.06.21 18:29, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:48:25PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021, 12:28 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> >> wrote: >> >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: >> >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/tutorial-fk.html >> Description: >> >> In earlier sections of the tutorial, the cities table had a column called >> 'name'. In this chapter, when creating the revised schema with foreign >> keys, >> the same column in the cities is now called 'city'. >> >> >> You are correct. I don't see an urgent need to spend time figuring out >> something different. > > I wrote the attached patch to improve this case. The tutorial documentation is meant to be consistent with src/tutorial/, which uses cities.name, so calling the column "city" was just plain wrong in that respect.
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: