Re: Reliability recommendations
От | Vivek Khera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reliability recommendations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 30917816-5D5E-4161-A21A-64DF2990777F@khera.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reliability recommendations (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reliability recommendations
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Feb 24, 2006, at 9:29 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Dell often says part X is included, but part X is not the exact > same as > part X sold by the original manufacturer. To hit a specific price > point, Dell is willing to strip thing out of commodity hardware, and > often does so even when performance suffers. For many people, this is > unacceptable. The last dell box I bought, a PE1850, came with a PERC 4e/Si card, which I believe is the same as the card the OP was looking at. It is very fast in RAID1 with two U320 disks. For real DB work, I'd look more to a dual channel card and have 1/2 of each mirror pair on opposing channels. Dell can configure that for you, I'm sure. I think the well tossed-around notion of Dells being underperforming needs to be re-evaluated with the EM64T Xeon based systems. They are quite fast. I haven't put a very large db with extreme loads on any of these systems, but the simple benchmarking I did on them shows them to be acceptable performers. The high-end RAID cards they sell these days do not seem to me to be skimpy. Now if they'd only get on the Opteron bandwagon....
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: