Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 30782.1677441105@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2022-12-08 16:15:11 -0800, Andres Freund wrote: >> The most frequent case is postgres_fdw, which somewhat regularly fails with a >> regression.diff like this: >> WHERE application_name = 'fdw_retry_check'; >> pg_terminate_backend >> ---------------------- >> - t >> -(1 row) >> +(0 rows) > Unless somebody comes up with a way to make the test more reliable pretty > soon, I think we should just remove it. It's one of the most frequently > flapping tests at the moment. If that's the only diff, we could just hide it, say by writing do $$ begin PERFORM pg_terminate_backend(pid, 180000) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE application_name = 'fdw_retry_check'; end $$; The actually important thing is the failure check after this; we don't care that much whether the initially-created connection is still live at this point. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: