Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow < |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3073cc9b1003022207w7139fdd8l336fca80161b140@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow < (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: >> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:02:54PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org> wrote: >>>> Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of a DECLARE >>>> section, throw an error message saying explicitly that the label must go >>>> before DECLARE. >>> >>> with the docs saying another thing, this couldn't be considered as a >>> bug fix and therefore backpatchable > >> +1 for back-patching. > > No, I intentionally didn't back-patch that. The only benefit of the > change is throwing a useful error message for questionable syntax. then, maybe a fix in the docs of back branches? OTOH, anyone that already had the docs downloaded will not benefit of that, but that is just as fair as if you don't update the server you don't get the last fixes ;) -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: