Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3073cc9b1001111116x53427c9bm1e448128a3b4f6c6@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Jaime Casanova >> <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> >>>> It might be useful to turn on trace_sort to see if the small files >>>> are coming from sorts. If they're from hashes I'm afraid there's >>>> no handy instrumentation ... >>>> >>> >>> yes they are, this is the log (i deleted the STATEMENT lines because >>> they were redundant), seems like all the temp files are used to >>> execute the same sentence... >>> >>> BTW, this is my laptop no the server. >> >> I think maybe there was supposed to be an attachment here? >> > > i knew i was forgotting something ;) > ah! and this is in 8.5dev but it's the same in 8.3 > oh! boy this can't be happen! attaching again -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: