Re: WAL file compatibility
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL file compatibility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3073cc9b0910202139s4b00a57sd908ec10910fdedf@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL file compatibility (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> writes: >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> OS per se shouldn't matter > >> unless you try to do it between windows and some flavor of linux > > hmmm ... even there, the only risk factor I see would be incompatible > locale behaviors, which you could avoid by making sure to use C locale > on both sides. That could possibly be an issue between any two OSes, > I suppose. > mmm... i was convinced windows had diferences in binary files just like on text files (ie: in text files there are differences because of the EOL character) but a litlle test seems to confirm that a WAL file generated on windows could be read on linux. -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: