Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3073cc9b0909221059g5d030916sa93a3c218d30607a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Jaime Casanova > <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote: >> have anyone better ideas about the name? if not, then go with >> pg_largeobject_meta > > I don't think there's anything wrong with calling it metadata. That > seems to leave the door open to future things we might want to do, > without restricting it to security-related settings or whatever. But > I don't see any reason to abbreviate it either - I'd go with > pg_largeobject_metadata rather than just pg_largeobject_meta. > ok! metadata is self explanatory meta is not... at least not for someone that his mother tongue is spanish and think of "meta" like in "goal" ;) -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: