Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3073cc9b0901261939h33da747el82503154a4cd3609@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd
Helmle
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Bruce, > >>> yes. we detect that and send a warning saying that there not be any rules >> >> OK, so we are going to need an option to suppress that warning, even >> without the problems of upgrades and customization. > > Per my response earlier, I think we really logically need an error if the > user specifies UPDATABLE. > a view should be updatable by default if the query expression is updatable... what we need is something to make a view READ ONLY even if it should be updatable by spec... having said that, i don't think that inventing new syntax is the way to go... a reloption seems better (thinking a little more, it could be a problem if the user changes the reloptions of an already created view) -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: