Re: non-WAL btree?

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Alex Vinogradovs
<AVinogradovs@clearpathnet.com> wrote:
> It's not that I expect a lot of improvement by having non-WAL
> indexing, it just sounds logical to me to have that, since
> index can be re-created fast enough during recovery,

and why you think that? if they are non WAL logged the only way to
re-create them after a recovery is with a REINDEX... dropping the
index and create after the bulk is just the same, i think...

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. (593) 87171157