Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing
От | Cui Shijun |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 306760850705170736r11b70550ged4d6db302b54671@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I see... I checked part of HOT patches(patch1), and found that it involves too many things I am not currently familar with. Maybe I should change an item to work. :-( Since I only studied part of source codes about transaction processing(lmgr/MVCC/xact but without xlog.c), I want to study "Group Commit" patch and try to review it, any suggestions? 2007/5/17, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>: > Pavan Deolasee wrote: > > On 5/17/07, Cui Shijun <rancpine@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I want to help the reviewing work of "ctid chain following enhancement ". > > > I've been studying the souce code which related with that part recently. > > > :-) > > > > > > > > Tom had objected to this patch on the grounds that it adds complexity > > without any significant gains. Though I don't completely agree with the > > first part, the second part is indeed debatable since the code is touched > > only > > for infrequently. > > Right. The reason the patch was kept in the queue is that there was > discussion that HOT will exercise that part of the code a lot more than > it does currently. > > -- > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: