Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions

On 3/2/18 3:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Ah, apologies - that's due to moving the patch from the last CF (it was
>> marked as RWF so I had to reopen it before moving it). I'll submit a new
>> version of the patch shortly, please mark it as WOA until then.
> 
> So, the way it's supposed to work is you resubmit the patch first and
> then re-activate the CF entry.  If you get to re-activate the CF entry
> without actually updating the patch, and then submit the patch
> afterwards, then the CF deadline becomes largely meaningless.  I think
> a new patch should rejected as untimely.

Hmmm, I missed that implication last night.  I'll mark this Returned
with Feedback.

Tomas, please move to the next CF once you have an updated patch.

Thanks,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net