Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol
От | Andrei Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3058cb64-245f-4cb7-a045-a30d3ac73725@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol ("Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/1/24 10:07, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote: > Here is a new rev of the patch which deals with the scenario > mentioned by Andrei [1] in which the queryId may change > due to a cached query invalidation. > > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/724348C9-8023-41BC-895E-80634E79A538%40amazon.com I discovered the current state of queryId reporting and found that it may be unlogical: Postgres resets queryId right before query execution in simple protocol and doesn't reset it at all in extended protocol and other ways to execute queries. I think we should generally report it when the backend executes a job related to the query with that queryId. This means it would reset the queryId at the end of the query execution. However, the process of setting up the queryId is more complex. Should we set it at the beginning of query execution? This seems logical, but what about the planning process? If an extension plans a query without the intention to execute it for speculative reasons, should we still show the queryId? Perhaps we should reset the state right after planning to accurately reflect the current queryId. See in the attachment some sketch for that - it needs to add queryId reset on abortion. -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: