Re: BUG #13524: Not Getting expected Serialization error
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #13524: Not Getting expected Serialization error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 30588.1438184445@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #13524: Not Getting expected Serialization error (bobby.rullo@coreos.com) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #13524: Not Getting expected Serialization error
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
bobby.rullo@coreos.com writes: > To reproduce: > 1) execute statements in sequence 1 on a connection, stopping at the > "--EXECUTE" statement. > 2) In another connection, execute all the statements in Sequence 2. > 3) Back in the first connection execute the remaining statement (the > "commit;") > Expected: > error when trying to commit, eg. "ERROR: could not serialize" > Actual: > Both commits succeed. > Interesting tidbit: > If you do the exact steps as above but uncomment the "select count(*)" in > sequence 2, you get the expected error. This seems perfectly fine to me. Without the "select count(*)" in transaction 2, there is a valid serialization of the transactions, ie t1 before t2. Serializability is *not* defined as "the transactions appear to have executed in the order they were started (or committed)". It is defined as "there is some consistent order in which they appear to have executed". regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: