Re: SRA Win32 sync() code
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SRA Win32 sync() code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5434AA10@cuthbert.rcsinc.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: SRA Win32 sync() code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Here is the SRA sync() code for Win32. As you might know, fsync on > Win32 is _commit, and sync() is _flushall. However, _flushall only > flushes only _open_ kernel buffers, not dirty buffers that have been > closed. Therefore, on Win32, during checkpoint, you have to open, > fsync(_commit), close all file that have been modified since the > previous checkpoint. That is not quite correct. flushall() flushes all open file streams, not open file 'handles' i.e. array references to _osfile[] returned by _open(). flushall() is an aggregate fflush() command(). Note that this is as implemented by Microsoft C runtime, not necessarily MinGW. So, when compiled with the ms C libraries, _flushall is useless. A _handle based flushall routine would have to loop over the _osfile array and commit file handles, or track them externally as SRA did. What about rewriting the close routine to call FlushFileBuffers before closing the file? Would this break anything? > Not sure how we are going to do this in Win32, but somehow we will have > to record all open files between checkpoints in an area that the > checkpoint process can read during a checkpoint. Iff the file handles can be reliably commited on closure this would not be necessary. The C runtime already keeps track of open files. Merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: