Re: Committing Resources to Win32
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Committing Resources to Win32 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5434AA02@cuthbert.rcsinc.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Committing Resources to Win32 ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Committing Resources to Win32
|
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
-----Original Message----- From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew@dunslane.net] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 10:02 AM To: pgsql-hackers-win32 Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Committing Resources to Win32 I don't think it makes sense to have threading on only one platform from a common code base. Perhaps a parallel effort needs to be to develop a threaded version for Unix and see how portable and stable it is, and then see how we can get that onto Windows. <snip> I 100% agree. Process management on windows is not *that* slow, and being able to track processes in the task manager is a nice feature. The IPC emulation over memory mapped files used in the PeerDirect port worked pretty much ok as did the rest of that port. If threading is really the way to go, it should be implemented and managed by the core team and not by the win32 porting effort. As for the move away from Visual Studio, it's going to cause a lot of short term pain (especially for would be contributors...like me :) ), but after some reflection I believe the move was the right one in the long run. Windows developers will be unfamiliar with the build environment but this can be mitigated by making a binary release for windows once in a while. Merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: