Re: XML ouput for psql
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XML ouput for psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5434A927@cuthbert.rcsinc.local обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > A larger point is that this is still a protocol revision; pretending it > ain't is just willful obscurantism. You can tell it's a protocol revision > because you will need to rewrite client-side libraries to take advantage > of it. If we try to look the other way and pretend it isn't one, then > we'll just be incurring pain --- the most obvious pain being that it > will be hard for those client libraries to tell whether the protocol > extension is supported or not. Is it at all worth considering returning an xml document as a scalar? In most cases when I'm extracting constructed documents from the backend I would not be using psql to do any processing beyond executing the query. Also, if at some point the backend learns to return more complex documents than simple table mappings, this does not complicate the protocol or the client libs. As for schemas, they could be manifestly requested by the query. For simplicity, they could be inlined into the document, returned instead of (think explain...), or as a separate column. Merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: