Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3039228.1677972069@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > Just pushed the actual pg_stat_io view, the splitting of the tablespace test, > and the pg_stat_io tests. One of the test cases is flapping a bit: diff -U3 /home/pg/build-farm-15/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/expected/stats.out /home/pg/build-farm-15/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/results/stats.out --- /home/pg/build-farm-15/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/expected/stats.out 2023-03-04 21:30:05.891579466+0100 +++ /home/pg/build-farm-15/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/test/regress/results/stats.out 2023-03-04 21:34:26.745552661+0100 @@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ SELECT :io_sum_shared_after_reads > :io_sum_shared_before_reads; ?column? ---------- - t + f (1 row) DROP TABLE test_io_shared; There are two instances of this today [1][2], and I've seen it before but failed to note down where. regards, tom lane [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=grison&dt=2023-03-04%2021%3A19%3A39 [2] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mule&dt=2023-03-04%2020%3A30%3A05
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: