Re: PostgreSQL ping/pong to client
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL ping/pong to client |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 30388.1555512499@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL ping/pong to client (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes: > On 4/17/19 5:39 AM, Ajay Pratap wrote: >> I am using PostgreSQL 10.7 as the database, and have Java web app. My >> app takes a lock on the database using the following command whenever my >> server is starting. >> /select /pg_try_advisory_lock/(100)/ >> To make sure only one instance of the App is using the database at a time. >> There have been several instances when my server crashes(or stops/ or >> kill), but this lock still remained on the PostgreSQL. Ideally, this >> should not happen because TCP connection breaks if one of the peers >> dies, but it happens otherwise. >> To solve this problem PostgreSQL needs to break the connection if the >> client dies. > But the problem as you describe it is that the server dies not the client. An advisory lock wouldn't survive a server reboot, so there's something not very accurate about this description. I suspect what the OP wants is quicker detection of client connection loss, and yes, messing with TCP timeouts and/or keepalive is the only way. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: