Re: DOMAIN/composite TYPE vs. base TYPE
От | Joe Abbate |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DOMAIN/composite TYPE vs. base TYPE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3032f56a-3a5c-682b-512e-af6e8cb363d1@freedomcircle.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DOMAIN/composite TYPE vs. base TYPE (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DOMAIN/composite TYPE vs. base TYPE
Re: DOMAIN/composite TYPE vs. base TYPE |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hello Rob, On 28/9/20 17:17, Rob Sargent wrote: > just record all three fields (day, month, year) with nulls and do the to-date as needed. That is not sufficient. An earlier implementation had something like a CHAR(8) to record YYYYMMDD, but how can you indicate, for example, an issue date of a bimonthly magazine, say July-Aug 2020? We can store 2020-07-01 in the DATE attribute, but we need another attribute to indicate it's really two months. Also, by storing three separate columns, you loose the beauty of the PG DATE abstraction. Joe
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: