Re: Memory leak during delete with sequential scan
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory leak during delete with sequential scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 30254.1410488277@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Memory leak during delete with sequential scan (Roman Konoval <rkonoval@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Memory leak during delete with sequential scan
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Roman Konoval <rkonoval@gmail.com> writes: > The simplified test which demonstrates this problem. > $ psql -U postgres postgres > psql (9.1.11, server 9.3.5) > postgres=# create table t (i integer, t text); > CREATE TABLE > postgres=# insert into t select v, > '01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789' > || text(v) from generate_series(1,4000000) v; > INSERT 0 4000000 > postgres=# \q > restart postgres > $ psql -U postgres postgres > execute 500 times the following command in the same connection > postgres=# delete from t where t = ''; I see absolutely no leak from this example in any existing release branch. > This problem can be reliably reproducible only after restart of postgres. That sounds suspiciously like what you are counting is a process's accesses to shared memory. You did not say what shared_buffers setting you're using, but if the "leak" tops out at something close to your shared_buffers setting then that's almost certainly what it is. In Linux systems you should generally be looking at RES minus SHR not just RES to determine a process' private memory. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: