Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3012983.1662429098@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg15b3: recovery fails with wal prefetch enabled
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes: > On 9/5/22 7:18 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: >> Well I was about to commit this, but beta4 just got stamped (but not >> yet tagged). I see now that Jonathan (with RMT hat on, CC'd) meant >> commits should be in by the *start* of the 5th AoE, not the end. So >> the procedural/RMT question is whether it's still possible to close >> this item in beta4. > Presumably because Tom stamped it, the released is wrapped so it > wouldn't make Beta 4, but I defer to him to see if it can be included > with the tag. I already made the tarballs available to packagers, so adding this would involve a re-wrap and great confusion. In any case, I'm not a fan of pushing fixes within a day or two of the wrap deadline, let alone after it; you get inadequate buildfarm coverage when you cut corners that way. I think this one missed the boat. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: