Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?
От | Ken Gunderson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.6.32.19991121165406.00836100@rmci.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? (Jochen Topf <pgsql-general@mail.remote.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical
applications?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
At 12:04 PM 11/21/99 -0500, Brett W. McCoy wrote: >> Stephen Birch <sbirch@ironmountainsystems.com> writes: >> Question: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? > >I think it is. In my office, we are converting hundreds of thousands of <snip> >database has several million rows across several tables, using a PHP3 >frontend. Here, though, speed is not the consideration but reliable >performance is. PostgreSQL has been very stable and I have no reason to >question its reliability. We are going to be moving our drug reaction >database over onto its own server soon and providing public (although >secure) access in the near future -- it will be using a mod_perl frontend, >along with the the PostgreSQL fulltext module. <snip> I am curious as to why you are choosing to use mod_perl instead of php3, especially since you've already been using php3?? And especially with php4/zend just around the corner. Not trying to start a flame war here, I just really want to know. Ciao-- Ken http://www.y2know.org/safari Failure is not an option- it comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: