Re: pg_dump: Sorted output, referential integrity
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump: Sorted output, referential integrity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20011208100250.031e7510@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump: Sorted output, referential integrity (Christof Petig <christof@petig-baender.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump: Sorted output, referential integrity
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 15:16 7/12/01 +0100, Christof Petig wrote: >> >> Not really very generalizable when you consider user defined types, >> triggers etc. > >Hmmm. But if we have a primary key on columns (A,B,C) and request the data >'order by A,B,C' this should be portable, shouldn't it? >If we don't have a primary key simply ordering by 1,2,3,...n should also work. >Or am I missing something? My mistake; I thought you wanted to compare metadata. Sorting data by PK seems like a reasonable thing to do. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: