Re: Another planner/optimizer question...
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Another planner/optimizer question... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20011102201624.02a85e50@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Another planner/optimizer question... (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:22 1/11/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >The best I could offer >you (short of a complete redesign of subqueries) would be to not pull up >views that have any subqueries, which would probably be a net loss. That's probably true 90% percent of the time; it would be interesting to be able to turn this on & off on a per-query basis (or even a per-view basis). Is this hard? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: