Re: pg_largeobject is a security hole
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_largeobject is a security hole |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20010628095414.03614100@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_largeobject is a security hole (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 19:49 27/06/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >Hmm. [sound of grepping] So does psql's \lo_list command. That's >annoying ... the list of large object OIDs is *exactly* what you'd want >to hide from the unwashed masses. Oh well, I'll leave bad enough alone >for now. > I suspect this would be cleaned up when/if we implement LOB LOCATORs: they have a limited lifetime, should be the only way to retrieve LOBs, and could hide the underlying OID (which would never be used by external interfaces). ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: