Re: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
От | Lincoln Yeoh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20010522093854.00a0cb40@192.228.128.13 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Re: Re: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 04:41 PM 21-05-2001 -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: > > As a rule of thumb, online applications that hold open > transactions during user interaction are considered to be > Broken By Design (tm). So I'd slap the programmer/design > team with - let's use the server box since it doesn't contain > anything useful. > Many web applications use persistent database connections for performance reasons. I suppose it's unlikely for webapps to update a row and then sit and wait a long time for a hit, so it shouldn't affect most of them. However if long running transactions are to be aborted automatically, it could possibly cause problems with some apps out there. Worse if long running transactions are _disconnected_ (not just aborted). Regards, Link.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: