Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
От | Lincoln Yeoh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20010507000238.009f8230@192.228.128.13 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>Lincoln Yeoh wrote: >> >> >Lincoln Yeoh wrote: >> >For example: you could then stick the WAL on a battery backed up RAM disk. >> >How much total space does a WAL log need? >> > >> >A battery backed RAM disk might even be cheaper than Brand X RDBMS >> >Proprietary Feature #5. >> >> And your experiments do help show that it is useful to be able to specify >> where things go, that putting just the WAL somewhere else makes things 20% >> faster. So you don't have to put everything on a pgfs. Just the WAL on some >> other FS (even FAT32, ick ;) ). At 02:04 PM 5/6/01 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote: >So you propose pgwalfs ? ;) Nah. I'm proposing the opposite in fact. I'm saying so far there appears to be no real need to come up with a special filesystem. Stick to using existing/future filesystems. Just make it easy and safe enough for DBA's to put the objects on whatever filesystem they choose. So long as the O/S kernel/driver people support the hardware or filesystem, postgresql will take advantage of it with little if any extra work. In fact as mlw's experiments show, you can put the WAL on FAT (FAT16?) for a 20% performance increase. How much better would a raw device be? Would it really be worth all that hassle? For instance if you need to resize the FAT partition, you could probably use fips, Partition Magic or some other cost effective solution - no need for pgsql developers or anybody to reinvent anything. My proposed but untested idea is that you could get a significant performance increase by putting the WAL on popular filesystems running on battery backed RAM drives (or other special hardware). 128MB RAM should be enough for small setups? Don't know how much these things cost, but I believe that when you need the speed, they'll be more worthwhile than a special proprietary filesystem. Ok, just found: http://www.expressdata.com.au/Products/ProductsList.asp?SUPPLIER_NAME=PLATYP US+TECHNOLOGY&SUBCATEGORY_NAME=QikDrive2#PRODUCTTITLE AUD$1,624.70 = USD843.06. Not cheap but not way out of reach. Haven't found other competing products yet. Must be somewhere. Cheerio, Link.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: