Re: CREATE MODULE (was: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names)
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE MODULE (was: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20001114120859.02b69360@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE MODULE (was: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names) (Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 20:33 13/11/00 -0500, Mark Hollomon wrote: >On Saturday 11 November 2000 20:30, Tom Lane wrote: >> Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes: >> >> > Might even be able to implement a 'CREATE MODULE' which loads an >> > object, enquires about functions in the module, and creates function >> > entries based on information returned from pg_fmgr_info... >> >> That could work ... something to think about for the future, anyway. > >I apporached the other way. LOAD MODULE would call a well defined >entry point which could then use SPI or some other facility to create >whatever. The problem with this suggestion (in the current context) is it does not make the function manager interface version independant. > I saw it as a way to distribute types and even whole applications. I don't know the details, but why not write an installer of some kind (RPM, etc)? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: