Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20001109234056.00a37b20@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Schemas (Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 08:59 9/11/00 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote: > >> Just seems like we'd be forcing non-standard syntax on >> ourselves when/if >> CREATE DATABASE becomes CREATE SCHEMA; > >I do not think this will be the way. > I know there was a lot of discussion of this a while ago, but was there a consistant set of decisions made? I'd be very interested if someone could post the current thinking re: schemas, catalogs, and environments, because the way I read the SQL99 docs, the catalog seems to correspond to a single postgres installation, and a schema seems to correspond to a postgres database (ie. tables and views are defined in a schema, and schemas are defined in a catalog, and catalogs are defined in an environment, and it looks like the environment is akin to the file system/implementation & postmaster). Presumably this was raised before, but I'd love to see the consensus view, if it is documented. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: