Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20001109024850.02f0a6d0@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:15 8/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >I like > > CREATE DATABASE foo WITH TEMPLATE 'template0' > >better than a SET command. Just seems like we'd be forcing non-standard syntax on ourselves when/if CREATE DATABASE becomes CREATE SCHEMA; I would assume that the two statements would become synonymous? Since this code is only for pg_dump, polluting CREATE DATABASE even further seems like a bad idea. No big deal, though. [Minor aside: would 'FROM TEMPLATE' be better?] Question: if I issue a "CREATE DATABASE foo WITH TEMPLATE 'my-favorite-db'" will I just get a copy of the specified database, including data? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: