At 23:20 14/10/00 -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
>Well, actually the question of whether failing referential actions
>due to permission deficits of the user doing the delete/update
>on the pk table is a bug or feature still stands. It would be
>fairly trivial to extend Peter's patch to effectively setuid on
>the actions, but the question is whether or not that's useful and
>correct.
>
I haven't looked at the standard yet, but maybe the correct behaviour
should be to setuid to the creator of the constraint for the purpose of the
checks.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/