Re: Reimplementing permission checks for rules

At 10:54 26/09/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>Comments?  Is this a general enough mechanism, and does it fit well
>with the various setUID tricks that people are thinking about?
>

Didn't Peter & Jan have a rewrite of the permissions system in the pipeline
- or has that disappeared? What Jan was proposing was rather more
substantial than just the setuid stuff, I *think*.




----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/