Dumping views as views?
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Dumping views as views? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20000914221655.037d4290@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | new relkind for view (Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Dumping views as views?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
In a continuing effort to make pg_dump produce valid SQL where possible, I would like to move away from the 'Create Table'/'Create Rule' method of defining views, and actually dump the 'Create View' command. This seems quite do-able, but before I start I thought I would ask if there were any reasons people could think of for not doing this? The approach will be: - when getting table info, also call pg_get_viewdef (which returns 'not a view' for non-view relations). - When dumping rules, ignore all 'view rules'. - Dump the 'Create View' statement in oid order as per normal. It would be really nice if there was a simple way of detecting view rules that was analagous to relkind. Is there a reason why this has not been done? Has it been done? Maybe the code that checks the rule name to see if it is a view could be put in the backend? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: