Re: pg_dump & performance degradation

At 23:41 31/07/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> 
>> I've missed something, obviously. What is the problem here?
>
>I am more concerned with giving people a pg_dump option of questionable
>value.

And, sadly, I think questionable effectiveness...


>I don't have problems adding it to the C code because it may be
>of use to some people.

It's pretty easy code to write; I'm actually more inclined to remove it and
avoid the clutter. I'll probably put a comment in the code as to how to do
it, and what the pitfalls are - then I/we don't need to maintain any more
unused code.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498)             |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/