Re: Security choices...
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Security choices... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20000729023921.02700210@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Security choices... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Security choices...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 12:25 28/07/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes: >> Is there any reason that a security model does not exist for psql that >> allows Unix user 'fred' to log in as PG user 'fred' with no password etc, >> but any user trying to log on as someone other than themselves has to >> provide a password? > >Define "log in as themselves" --- in particular, how will you check? I was thinking (in a very blinkered way) of client processes on the same machine as the postmaster. Admitedly, I had not considered network access etc. Even in this limited form, it does not seem too bad; is there a way the postmaster can tell (a) the client is on the same machine, and (b) what the process username is? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: