Re: TODO updates
От | Philip Warner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TODO updates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.5.32.20000724105007.0262f500@mail.rhyme.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TODO updates (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: TODO updates
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 12:36 23/07/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes: >> As of the latest pg_dump, it dumps in modified oid order: rules, triggers, >> views and indexes always go at end, but the rest is in oid order. > >Hmm, I think you need to dump views in OID order just as though they >were tables. What if an SQL function refers to a view? The actual list of things it moves to the end is: TABLE DATA, BLOBS, INDEX, TRIGGER, RULE and ACL. The underlying table for a view is created in OID order, so I would guess that referencing it in an SQL function would still be OK. Is that OK? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Warner | __---_____ Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \ (A.C.N. 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_ Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \ Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ | Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________-- PGP key available upon request, | / and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: