Re: Re: [SQL] MAX() of 0 records.

At 14:35 9/07/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>so the construct is definitely not SQL-compliant.  Maybe we should just
>forbid it.  However, if you are joining against another table (which
>itself is not an SQL feature) then it seems like there is some potential
>use in it.  What do people think of my implicit-GROUP-BY-ctid idea?
>That would basically say that the aggregate is computed over all the
>tuples that join to a single target tuple.

Sounds perfect to me...


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498)             |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/