Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20010523162448.01797330@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 08:15 AM 5/24/01 +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote: >> Unless we want to abandon MVCC (which I don't), I think an overwriting >> smgr is impractical. > >Impractical ? Oracle does it. It's not easy, though ... the current PG scheme has the advantage of being relatively simple and probably more efficient than scanning logs like Oracle has to do (assuming your datafiles aren't thoroughly clogged with old dead tuples). Has anyone looked at InterBase for hints for space-reusing strategies? As I understand it, they have a tuple-versioning scheme similar to PG's. If nothing else, something might be learned as to the efficiency and effectiveness of one particular approach to solving the problem. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: