At 09:32 AM 11/16/00 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>* Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> [001116 08:59] wrote:
>> Ewe, so we have this 1/200 second delay for every transaction. Seems
>> bad to me.
>
>I think as long as it becomes a tunable this isn't a bad idea at
>all. Fixing it at 1/200 isn't so great because people not wrapping
>large amounts of inserts/updates with transaction blocks will
>suffer.
I think the default should probably be no delay, and the documentation
on enabling this needs to be clear and obvious (i.e. hard to miss).
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.