Re: Question about reliability?
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question about reliability? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20001109084743.01696290@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question about reliability? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:43 AM 11/9/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Would there be any potential to avoid these (possibly) unnecessary deaths? > >No, at least it'll never get my vote. Besides, it's not that difficult for an application to recover from these prophylactic backend deaths. My PG driver for AOLserver does so transparently, retrying queries that get the "sorry I've been asked to shut down because some other backend screwed up and died - please retry your query" but returning an error for the actual query that caused a backend to hose itself. The code using the driver is unaware that anything has happened (other than the thread issuing the query that hosed the backend that died in execution, of course). - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: