Re: pg_dump & performance degradation
| От | Don Baccus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump & performance degradation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000801060553.013e2ca0@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump & performance degradation (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 02:31 PM 8/1/00 +1000, Philip Warner wrote: >>Have you tried pg_dump on a multi-processor machine, which most serious >>database-backed websites run on these days? Do you see the same performance >>degradation? My site runs on a dual P450 with RAID 1 LVD disks, and cost >>me exactly $2100 to build (would've been less if I'd laid off the extra >>cooling fans!) > >The original request came from a person with a "4-CPU Xeon with 2GB of >RAM", but the "solution" does not seem to work for them (I think), so it's >probably a waste of time. It seems really strange that pg_dump could suck the guts out of a four-processor machine. What kind of device were they backing up to? Disk? - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: