Re: Performance for seq. scans
От | Steve Heaven |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance for seq. scans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000726123922.0071cca8@mail.thornet.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance for seq. scans (Jules Bean <jules@jellybean.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
At 12:28 26/07/00 +0100, Jules Bean wrote: >> We were in a similar position and went for the 'Full Text Indexing" extra. >> You'll find it in contrib/fulltextindex. >> It creates a function which you call on a trigger to produce an index of >> words for specified fields. These indexes do get _very_ large (one of ours >> is ~800 MB), but it does work very well and speeds searches up enormously. > >If I understand you correctly, that's word-based? It's just splitting >on whitespace and punctuation? Unfortunately, that's not quite what >we need --- our wildcard searches needn't have their '%' on word >boundaries. > There is a function in the source called breakup(). This can be customised to create the index entries on sub-word strings. Steve -- thorNET - Internet Consultancy, Services & Training Phone: 01454 854413 Fax: 01454 854412 http://www.thornet.co.uk
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: